These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In vivo antimalarial efficacy of Artemisia afra powder suspensions.
    Author: Walz A, Lehmann U, Duthaler U, Mäser P, Wittlin S.
    Journal: Phytomedicine; 2024 Jul; 129():155644. PubMed ID: 38761524.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: A global death toll of 608,000 in 2022 and emerging parasite resistance to artemisinin, the mainstay of antimalarial chemotherapy derived from the Chinese herb Artemisia annua, urge the development of novel antimalarials. A clinical trial has found high antimalarial potency for aqueous extracts of A. annua as well as its African counterpart Artemisia afra, which contains only trace amounts of artemisinin. The artemisinin-independent antimalarial activity of A. afra points to the existence of other antimalarials present in the plant. However, the publication was retracted due to ethical and methodological concerns in the trial, so the only evidence for antimalarial activity of A. afra is built on in vitro studies reporting efficacy only in the microgram per milliliter range. HYPOTHESIS: Our study aims to shed more light on the controversy around the antimalarial activity of A. afra by assessing its efficacy in mice. In particular, we are testing the hypothesis that A. afra contains a pro-drug that is inactive in vitro but active in vivo after metabolization by the mammalian host. METHODS: Plasmodium berghei-infected mice were treated once or thrice (on three consecutive days) with various doses of A. afra, A. annua, or pure artemisinin. RESULTS: Aqueous powder suspensions of A. annua but not A. afra showed antimalarial activity in mice. CONCLUSION: Our experiments conducted in mice do not support the pro-drug hypothesis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]