These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Differential renal length index: useful measure in management of isolated unilateral hydronephrosis?
    Author: Gharpure K, Lobo S, Bandaru M, Johal N, Verveckken K, de Baets K, van Hoeck K, DeWin G, Cherian A.
    Journal: BJU Int; 2024 Oct; 134(4):578-581. PubMed ID: 38813816.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the usefulness of the 'differential renal length index' (iDRL) before and after pyeloplasty, as the anteroposterior diameter is commonly used to quantify hydronephrosis but inaccuracies arise due to interobserver variability, hydration status and pure intra-renal dilatation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data, from two centres, of all children undergoing pyeloplasty for isolated unilateral pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) (2015-2021) were analysed. Subgroup analysis was undertaken: Group A - differential renal function (DRF) ≥40%, Group B - subnormal DRF (20-39%), and Group C - symptomatic. Children with structural anomalies of upper and lower urinary tract, bilateral involvement, and subnormal DRF (<20%) were excluded. All the children had a pre- and postoperative ultrasound scan and Tc99m mercapto-acetyltriglycine (MAG3) renograms. The iDRL was calculated as follows: iDRL = ([a - b]/b) × 100, where 'a' is the length of hydronephrotic kidney (cm) and 'b' is the length of contralateral normal kidney (cm). The mean difference and standard error of mean (SEM) between the pre- and postoperative iDRL was evaluated using the paired Student's t-test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 119 children with 1-year follow-up were included. For the entire cohort, the mean (SEM) preoperative iDRL was 27.7 (1.4) and postoperatively was 12.5 (1.1), with a mean (range) DRF improvement of 54% (44-66%) (P < 0.001). In Group A (n = 97), the mean (SEM) preoperative iDRL was 26.6 (1.5) and postoperatively was 13.1 (1.2), with a mean (range) DRF improvement of 50% (38-63%) (P < 0.001). In Group B (n = 22), the mean (SEM) preoperative iDRL was 32.6 (3.5) and postoperatively was 10.0 (2.8), with a mean (range) DRF improvement of 69% (49-89%) (P < 0.001). In Group C (n = 28), the mean (SEM) preoperative iDRL was 19.9 (2.3) and postoperatively was 7.7 (1.9), with a mean (range) DRF improvement of 61% (38-85%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study identifies the iDRL as a useful measure of improvement following successful pyeloplasty. In the subgroup with DRF of >39% minimum improvement was >37%. Similar minimum DRF improvement was also noted (>37%) in hypo-functioning kidneys and symptomatic PUJO.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]