These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Surgical Outcomes of Revision Orbital Reconstruction in Patients With Inadequate Primary Orbital Fracture Repair.
    Author: Choi YA, Yang MK, Sa HS.
    Journal: J Craniofac Surg; ; 35(5):1461-1465. PubMed ID: 38819131.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with complications following inadequate primary orbital fracture repair and to evaluate surgical outcomes of secondary revision orbital reconstruction. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed data from 41 patients who underwent revision orbital reconstruction by a single surgeon following complications from primary orbital fracture repair performed elsewhere. Clinical characteristics, including enophthalmos, exophthalmos, diplopia, ocular motility limitation, epiphora, infraorbital hypoesthesia, infection, eyelid malposition, lagophthalmos, hypoglobus, and compressive optic neuropathy, were assessed. Surgical outcomes of revision surgery were evaluated to determine improvements in clinical deficits and postoperative patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The most common postoperative complications of primary orbital fracture repair were enophthalmos (n=20/41) and diplopia (n=20/41). The mean time between primary and revision surgeries was 67.2 months (range: 1-276 mo). Revision surgery significantly improved enophthalmos, diplopia (Hess area ratio), epiphora (Munk score), periorbital pain, and exophthalmos ( P =0.003, P =0.001, P <0.001, P <0.001, and P =0.007, respectively) compared to the pre-revision state. In addition, 6 patients experienced improved infraorbital hypoesthesia. Among the 41 patients, 23 were very satisfied, 17 were satisfied, and 1 was neutral after revision orbital reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the positive impact of revision orbital reconstruction in addressing complications from inadequate primary orbital fracture repair. Surgeons should consider revision surgery to address clinical deficits following prior surgery, especially when anatomic abnormalities are evident in imaging studies, regardless of the time lapse since the initial surgery or concerns about tissue fibrosis and fat atrophy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]