These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Notch ratio in pulmonary flow predicts long-term survival after pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
    Author: Beijk MAM, Winkelman JA, Eckmann HM, Samson DA, Widyanti AP, Vleugels J, Bombeld DCM, Meijer CGCM, Bogaard HJ, Noordegraaf AV, de Bruin-Bon HACM, Bouma BJ.
    Journal: Heart Vessels; 2024 Nov; 39(11):968-978. PubMed ID: 38837085.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Assessment of the pattern of the RV outflow tract Doppler provides insights into the hemodynamics of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We studied whether pre-operative assessment of timing of the pulmonary flow systolic notch by Doppler echocardiography is associated with long-term survival after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for CTEPH. METHODS: Fifty-nine out of 61 consecutive CETPH patients (mean age 53 ± 14 years, 34% male) whom underwent PEA between June 2002 and June 2005 were studied. Clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic variables were assessed pre-operatively and repeat echocardiography was performed 3 months after PEA. Notch ratio (NR) was assessed with pulsed Doppler and calculated as the time from onset of pulmonary flow until notch divided by the time from notch until end of pulmonary flow. Long-term follow-up was obtained between May 2021 and February 2022. RESULTS: Pre-operative mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was 45 ± 15 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was 646 ± 454 dynes.s.cm-5. Echocardiography before PEA showed that 7 patients had no notch, 33 had a NR < 1.0 and 19 had a NR > 1.0. Three months after PEA, echocardiography revealed a significant decrease in sPAP in long-term survivors with a NR < 1.0 and a NR > 1.0, while a significant increase in TAPSE/sPAP was only observed in the NR < 1.0 group. Mean long-term clinical follow-up was 14 ± 6 years. NR was significantly different between survivors and non-survivors (0.73 ± 0.25 vs. 1.1 ± 0.44, p < 0.001) but no significant differences were observed in mPAP or PVR. Long-term survival at 14 years was significantly better in patients with a NR < 1.0 compared to patients with a NR > 1.0 (83% vs. 37%, p =  < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pre-operative assessment of NR is a predictor of long-term survival in CTEPH patients undergoing PEA, with low mortality risk in patients with NR < 1.0. Long-term survivors with a NR < 1.0 and NR > 1.0 had a significant decrease in sPAP after PEA. However, the TAPSE/sPAP only significantly increased in the NR < 1.0 group. In the NR < 1.0 group, the 6-min walk test increased significantly between pre-operative and at 1-year post-operative follow-up. NR is a simple echocardiographic parameter that can be used in clinical decision-making for PEA.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]