These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A national survey of clinicians' opinions of rotational vaginal births.
    Author: Parris DL, Jaufuraully S, Opie J, Siassakos D, Napolitano R.
    Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Aug; 299():83-90. PubMed ID: 38843726.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Malposition of the fetal head, defined as occiput transverse or posterior positions, occurs in approximately 5% of births. At full cervical dilatation, fetal malposition is associated with an increased risk of rotational vaginal birth. There are three different rotational methods: manual rotation, rotational ventouse or rotational (Kielland's) forceps. In the absence of robust evidence, it is not currently known which of the three methods is most efficacious, and safest for parents and babies. OBJECTIVE: To gain greater insights into opinions and preferences of rotational birth to explore the acceptability and feasibility of performing a randomised trial comparing different rotational methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey was sent via email to obstetricians from the British Maternal Fetal Medicine Society, as well as expert obstetricians and active academics in ongoing research in the UK. The questions focussed on perceived competence, preferred rotational method, location (theatre or labour room), willingness to recruit to an RCT, and its outcome measures. Closed questions were followed by the option of free text to allow further comments. The free text answers underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: 252 consultant obstetricians responded. The majority stated they were competent in performing manual rotation (88.1%). Half felt proficient using Kielland's rotational forceps (54.4%). Most obstetricians felt skilled in rotational ventouse (76.2%). Manual rotation was the preferred first rotational method of choice in cases of both occiput transverse and posterior positions. The decision for which rotational method to attempt first was considered case-dependent by many. Two thirds of obstetricians would usually conduct rotational births in theatre (67.9%). Over half (52%) do not routinely use intrapartum ultrasound. Most (62.7%) would be willing to recruit to a randomised controlled trial comparing manual versus instrumental rotation. Over half (57.2%) would be willing to recruit to the same RCT if they were the most senior doctor competent in rotational vaginal birth supervising a junior. CONCLUSION: There is a wide range of practice in conducting rotational vaginal births in the UK. An RCT to investigate the impact of different rotational methods on outcome would be both feasible and desirable, especially in research-active hospitals.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]