MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Investigation of accordance between nutritional assessment tools, and bio-electrical impedance-derived phase angle, with the global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria in hemodialysis patients.
Author: El Alami El Hassani N, Akrichi MA, Bajit H, Alem C.
Journal: Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2024 Aug; 62():260-269. PubMed ID: 38865238.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition (MN) is a major health concern for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who receive maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). These patients are particularly vulnerable to MN due to their compromised health status, which in turn increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. However, there is limited evidence on the use of reliable and effective tools for assessing MN in this population. This lack of sufficient data highlights the crucial need to assess MN within these patients, considering the significant mortality risk it poses. The first aim of this study was to compare the concurrent validity of three nutritional methods: the 7-point Subjective Global Assessment (7p-SGA), the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), and the Nutritional Risk Screening from 2002 (NRS-2002) with the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in MHD patients. The second aim was to investigate the advantage of the bio-electrical impedance-derived phase angle (PhA) in predicting MN. METHODS: one hundred sixty-eight outpatients (31% women) with a mean age of 56.9 ± 14.7 years and a median dialysis vintage of 48 months were included in this retrospective study. Nutritional scores, anthropometric measurements, biological markers, and body composition parameters were collected. RESULTS: According to GLIM standards, MN was identified in 80% of these patients. Using logistic regression (LR) analysis, all nutritional scores were significantly associated with GLIM criteria, with optimal sensitivity (94.4%) and specificity (85.7%) for 7p-SGA and NRI, respectively. For discriminating the nutritional risk, the GLIM criteria demonstrated a good agreement with 7p-SGA (Kappa concordance coefficient (κ) = 0.677, p-value<0.001) with a good level of accuracy (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.841; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.705-0.977; p-value <0.001) when compared to the NRI and NRS-2002 (κ = 0.522, p-value<0.001 and κ = 0.411, p-value = 0.006, respectively). An excellent accuracy was found between PhA and the GLIM-defined MN, with an optimal cut-off value of 5.5° for males and 4.5° for females. The LR showed that arm circumference is the parameter that most influences the decrease of PhA (odds ratio 2.710, 95% CI = 1.597-4.597, p-value <0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the present study, 7p-SGA is the most sensitive score in identifying MN diagnosed by GLIM criteria. Nonetheless, NRI exhibits greater specificity. PhA is a valuable marker for MN in MHD patients.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]