These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Which cephalosporin for wound prophylaxis? An experimental comparison of three drugs.
    Author: Scher KS, Jones CW.
    Journal: Surgery; 1985 Jul; 98(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 3892746.
    Abstract:
    An experimental wound model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of cefazolin, cefamandole, and cefotaxime in the prevention of wound infection. Incisions were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, or a standardized fecal suspension. Regardless of the contaminant employed, the prophylactic use of either cefazolin, cefamandole, or cefotaxime yielded lower concentrations of bacteria in the wounds and fewer infections compared with treatment with saline solution. Within the context of this experimental model, cefazolin proved equally as effective as the newer and more expensive cephalosporins, cefamandole and cefotaxime.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]