These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Long-term cosmetic results comparing Proximate stapler with Dermalon skin closure. Author: Nilsson T, Frimodt-Møller C, Jeppesen N. Journal: Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1985; 74(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 3893308. Abstract: Sixteen patients having had an aorto-femoral bifurcation bypass performed were allocated at random for having their right inguinal incisions sutured with staplers and the left incisions with monofilament nylon sutures or vice versa. Long-term follow-up (11 months) demonstrated no differences in the appearance of the scars. The only advantage of the stapler is the short duration of skin-closure as compared to the sutured wounds. Since the long-term cosmetic results are equal and the cost price of the staplers are far higher than sutures we cannot recommend staplers for skin closure in routine operations.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]