These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Determinants of Bone Mass Accrual in Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth Undergoing Pubertal Suppression Therapy.
    Author: Roberge S, Roberge T, Corathers S, Nasomyont N.
    Journal: J Clin Densitom; 2024; 27(3):101505. PubMed ID: 38936233.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Gender-affirming care for gender diverse and transgender (GDTG) youth includes puberty suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa). Puberty is a critical period of bone mass accrual, and pubertal suppression may impact bone health. Previous studies have shown a decrease in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) Z-score while on puberty suppression. However, the rate of bone mass accrual and its determinants during GnRHa therapy are not known. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective chart review of GDTG youth with aBMD assessment within six months of starting GnRHa monotherapy at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center between 01/2011 and 12/2022. In individuals with follow-up aBMD assessment, we calculated their aBMD velocity and generated Z-scores using reference data from the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study. The determinants of baseline height-adjusted aBMD and aBMD velocity Z-scores were assessed with multiple linear regression models. RESULTS: Thirty-six participants (36% assigned female at birth (AFAB), mean age at first aBMD assessment 12 ± 1.1 years) had baseline height-adjusted aBMD Z-score of -0.053 ± 0.79. Among 16 participants with follow-up aBMD assessment, the mean aBMD velocity Z-score was -0.42 ± 1.13 (-0.27 ± 0.79 in AFAB vs -0.52 ± 1.32 in assigned male at birth, p = 0.965). Baseline aBMD Z-scores significantly correlated with age at the first aBMD assessment (adjusted R2 0.124, p = 0.02) with combined modeling including age at first aBMD assessment and BMI Z-score being most significant (adjusted R2 0.21, p = 0.008). Only BMI Z-scores were positively associated with the aBMD-velocity Z-scores (adjusted R2 0.255, p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: GDTG youth undergoing GnRHa therapy appeared to have below-average aBMD velocity Z-scores. A lower BMI Z-score was a determinant of lower baseline height-adjusted aBMD and aBMD velocity Z-scores. Building on previous studies, our study highlights aBMD velocity as a novel technique for bone health surveillance in GDTG youth.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]