These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Growth discordancy in twin pregnancies: a risk factor not detected by measurements of biparietal diameter. Author: Erkkola R, Ala-Mello S, Piiroinen O, Kero P, Sillanpää M. Journal: Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Aug; 66(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 3895071. Abstract: Among 460 twin pregnancies delivered at the University Central Hospital of Turku from 1970 to 1981, there were 41 (8.9%) with a weight difference of 25% or more between twins when calculated from the weight of the larger twin. The perinatal death rate in the first group (9.7%) was significantly higher (P less than .01) than the perinatal death rate (3.7%) in the group with the weight difference of less than 25%. The intrauterine mortality rate, in particular, was significantly increased (P less than .001) in the group with 25% or more difference being 6.5-fold when compared with the more difference being 6.5-fold when compared with the group with the lower weight difference. Among 271 twin pregnancies examined by ultrasound one to two weeks before delivery, there were 31 (11.4%) pairs of twins with a 3-mm or more difference in biparietal diameter, 11 (4.1%) with a 4-mm or more difference, and seven (2.6%) with a 5-mm or more difference. The sensitivity of measurements of biparietal diameter to detect the growth discordancy was 9 to 35%, the specificity 90 to 98%, and the positive predictivity 23 to 29%. This study indicates that a divergent growth pattern in twin pregnancy carries an elevated risk of intrauterine death, especially for the smaller twin. Measurement of biparietal diameter is not a method sensitive enough to detect these high-risk twin pregnancies.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]