These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Characterizing lipid constituents of B. moojeni snake venom: a comparative approach for chemical and biological investigations. Author: Carvalho NS, Nardini V, Veronezes RM, Maciel JB, Trabuco AC, De Carvalho MF, Fontanari C, Sartim MA, de Moraes LAB, Faccioli LH. Journal: Arch Toxicol; 2024 Oct; 98(10):3491-3502. PubMed ID: 38951190. Abstract: Snake venoms are complex mixtures majorly composed of proteins with well-studied biological effects. However, the exploration of non-protein components, especially lipids, remains limited despite their potential for discovering bioactive molecules. This study compares three liquid-liquid lipid extraction methods for both chemical and biological analyses of Bothrops moojeni snake venom. The methods evaluated include the Bligh and Dyer method (methanol, chloroform, water), considered standard; the Acunha method, a modification of the Bligh and Dyer protocol; and the Matyash method (MTBE/methanol/water), featuring an organic phase less dense than the aqueous phase. Lipidomic analysis using liquid chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) system revealed comparable values of lipid constituents' peak intensity across different extraction methods. Our results show that all methods effectively extracted a similar quantity of lipid species, yielding approximately 17-18 subclasses per method. However, the Matyash and Acunha methods exhibited notably higher proportions of biologically active lipids compared to the Bligh and Dyer method, particularly in extracting lipid species crucial for cellular structure and function, such as sphingomyelins and phosphatidylinositol-phosphate. In conclusion, when selecting a lipid extraction method, it is essential to consider the study's objectives. For a biological approach, it is crucial to evaluate not only the total quantity of extracted lipids but also their quality and biological activity. The Matyash and Acunha methods show promise in this regard, potentially offering a superior option for extracting biologically active lipids compared to the Bligh and Dyer method.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]