These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Improvements in edema and microcirculation in chronic venous insufficiency with Pycnogenol® or elastic compression.
    Author: Belcaro G, Cesarone MR, Cox D, Scipione C, Scipione V, Dugall M, Hu S, Corsi M, Feragalli B, Cotellese R.
    Journal: Minerva Surg; 2024 Aug; 79(4):448-454. PubMed ID: 38953757.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is the consequence of venous valve reflux and/or venous flow obstruction and resulting venous hypertension in the lower extremities. The aim of this prospective supplement registry study was to evaluate the efficacy of compression stockings or Pycnogenol® in controlling symptoms and edema in CVI and their efficacy on microcirculatory parameters. METHODS: Two comparable groups of 30 subjects with CVI were observed for 4 months. RESULTS: Elastic compression was less tolerated than Pycnogenol® with 12 subjects being unable to follow the compression routine. No side effects due to supplementation were observed; tolerability of the supplementation was optimal. Ambulatory venous pressure (AVP) and refilling time (RT) at inclusion indicated a significant increase in venous pressure and reflux (refilling time <16 seconds). AVP and RT did not change after 4 months. Microcirculatory and clinical measurements were comparable at inclusion between the 2 groups. After 4 months, skin resting flux (RF) and skin PO<inf>2</inf>-PCO<inf>2</inf> were significantly improved with Pycnogenol® compared to compression (P<0.05). The significant increase in skin PO<inf>2</inf> and the decrease in PCO<inf>2</inf> after Pycnogenol® intake were ascribed to the decrease in the abnormally high skin resting flux, a sign of better perfusion and skin nutritional supply. Pycnogenol® reduced leg volume, on average by 18.3% in the evening compared to 4.4% of reduction with compression (P<0.05) showing an important effect on edema. The venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and the composite symptom score (CSS) decreased significantly in the Pycnogenol® group compared to compression, indicating a better improvement in microcirculatory perfusion and nutritional supply produced by the supplementation of Pycnogenol® in comparison with compression. Pycnogenol® significantly improved microcirculation and clinical symptoms in comparison with compression. The decrease in local oxidative stress (OS) at the distal perimalleolar region with Pycnogenol® was significant in comparison with compression (P<0.05). A lower local OS is an important metabolic indication of a better capillary perfusion with better nutritional exchanges. At the end of the registry study, four small ulcerations and skin breaks in four limbs (between 3 and 5 mm of maximum diameters) were observed in the compression group. No ulcerations or skin breaks were observed in the Pycnogenol® group. CONCLUSIONS: Pycnogenol® relieved edema, improved microcirculation in CVI patients and reduced stationary, interstitial fluid in comparison with compression. Most symptoms of CVI are associated with interstitial water retention; the presence of extra fluid in limb tissues alters perfusion and nutrient supply. Pycnogenol® supplementation reduced water and fluid accumulation in CVI limbs and improved microcirculation and local oxidative stress thus showing important anti-edema effects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]