These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diagnostic Accuracy of Somatosensory Evoked Potential and Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential in Detection of Neurological Injury in Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Surgeries: A Short-Term Follow-Up Prospective Interventional Study Experience from Tertiary Care Center of India.
    Author: Mishra MK, Pandey N, Sharma HB, Prasad RS, Sahu A, Pradhan RS, Yadav V.
    Journal: Asian J Neurosurg; 2024 Jun; 19(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 38974440.
    Abstract:
    Objective  Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is an acknowledged tool for real-time neuraxis assessment during surgery. Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and transcranial motor evoked potential (MEP) are commonest deployed modalities of IONM. Role of SSEP and MEP in intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor (IDEMSCT) surgery is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of SSEP and transcranial MEP, in detection of intraoperative neurological injury in IDEMSCT patients as well as their postoperative limb-specific neurological improvement assessment at fixed intervals till 30 days. Materials and Methods  Symptomatic patients with IDEMSCTs were selected according to the inclusion criteria of study protocol. On modified McCormick (mMC) scale, their sensory-motor deficit was assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively. Surgery was done under SSEP and MEP (transcranial) monitoring using appropriate anesthetic agents. Gross total/subtotal resection of tumor was achieved as per IONM warning alarms. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of SSEP and MEP were calculated considering postoperative neurological changes as "reference standard." Patients were followed up at postoperative day (POD) 0, 1, 7, and 30 for convalescence. Statistical Analysis  With appropriate tests of significance, statistical analysis was carried out. Receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to find cutoff point of mMC for SSEP being recordable in patients with higher neurological deficit along with calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of SSEP and MEP for prediction of intraoperative neurological injury. Results  Study included 32 patients. Baseline mean mMC value was 2.59. Under neuromonitoring, gross total resection of IDEMSCT was achieved in 87.5% patients. SSEP was recordable in subset of patients with mMC value less than or equal to 2 with diagnostic accuracy of 100%. MEP was recordable in all patients and it had 96.88% diagnostic accuracy. Statistically significant neurological improvement was noted at POD-7 and POD-30 follow-up. Conclusion  SSEP and MEP individually carry high diagnostic accuracy in detection of intraoperative neurological injuries in patients undergoing IDEMSCT surgery. MEP continues to monitor the neuraxis, even in those subsets of patients where SSEP fails to record.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]