These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Single vs. Double-Opposing Z-Plasty: Evaluating Their Impact on Palatoplasty Postoperative Outcomes.
    Author: Elayah SA, Sakran KA, Alawadhi N, Younis H, Telha W, Holkom M, Wu M, Li Y, Shi B.
    Journal: Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jul 11; 28(8):422. PubMed ID: 38990357.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The double-opposing Z-plasty is a fundamental approach for cleft palate repair. Recently, some surgeons have begun implementing a single Z-Plasty, igniting discussions on the most effective technique for enhancing postoperative outcomes. Consequently, this study sought to evaluate the outcomes of employing single and double Z-plasties within the modified Sommerlad-Furlow technique. METHODS: 116 cleft palate patients undergoing primary surgical repair were divided into two groups: those treated with the Sommerlad-Furlow method using a double-opposing Z-plasty (S.F.2.Z.P. group, n = 58) and those receiving a single nasal Z-plasty (S.F.1.Z.P. group, n = 58). Data on cleft type and width, soft palate length, palatal fistula, and velopharyngeal function were collected. Mann-Whitney test compared the mean values between groups. RESULTS: The S.F.2ZP group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in soft palate length compared to those in the S.F.1ZP group (p = 0.008). However, the S.F.1ZP group demonstrated adequate soft palate length (7.9 ± 2.8 mm) compared to the S.F.2ZP group (9.3 ± 2.8 mm). The velopharyngeal function was good in both groups, with no significant differences (P = 0.52). While the proper velopharyngeal closure was 81% in the S.F.1ZP group and 87.9% in the S.F.2ZP group, velopharyngeal insufficiency was 10.3% and 5.2%, respectively. The rates of persistent palatal fistula were 5.2% in the S.F.1ZP group and 3.4% in the S.F.2ZP group, with no significant differences found between both groups (P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in crucial outcomes such as velopharyngeal function and the incidence of persistent palatal fistulas, indicating the effectiveness of both techniques. While the double-opposing Z-plasty demonstrated a statistically significant increase in soft palate length, the a nasal Z-plasty demonstrated adequate soft palate length which sufficiently enables effective velopharyngeal closure. These outcomes suggest that a single Z-plasty is both effective and easy to perform, making it a valuable surgical approach for achieving the desired outcomes.. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The current study suggests that although the soft palate may not be as elongated with nasal Z-plasty alone compared to the double Z-plasty, it sufficiently enables effective velopharyngeal closure.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]