These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Accuracy of Inchworm Sign on Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Differentiating Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.
    Author: Kazan HO, Culpan M, Gunduz N, Keser F, Iplikci A, Atis RG, Yildirim A.
    Journal: Bladder Cancer; 2022; 8(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 38994517.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Inchworm sign is a finding on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI) and is used to better stratify T-staging in muscle invasive (MIBC) and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). An uninterrupted low submucosal signal on DWI, defined as inchworm sign (IS), indicates NMIBC. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define the diagnostic accuracy of IS in primary bladder cancer, as well as find agreement between the urologists and the radiologist. METHODS: Between December 2018 and December 2020, we retrospectively analyzed 95 primary bladder cancer patients who had undergone multiparametric-MRI before transurethral resection. Patients with former bladder cancer history, tumors smaller than 10 mm, and MRI without proper protocol, as well as patients who did not attend follow-up, were excluded. In total, 71 patients' images were evaluated by a genitourinary specialist radiologist and two urologists. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of IS and VI-RADS in differentiating MIBC and NMIBC, and interreader agreement between the radiologist and urologists were analyzed. RESULTS: During follow-up, 38 patients (53.5%) were IS-positive, while 33 patients (46.5%) were negative. Among the 33 patients with negative IS, 14 patients (42.4%) had MIBC. Meanwhile, two out of the 38 IS-positive patients (5.3%) had MIBC (p = 0.00). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of IS in predicting MIBC were 87.5%, 63.6%, 41.2%and 94.6%, respectively. The interobserver agreement between the urologists and radiologist was almost perfect ( K  = 0.802 and K  = 0.745). CONCLUSION: The absence of IS on DWI is useful in differentiating MIBC from NMIBC. It is a simple finding that can be interpreted by urologists.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]