These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Performance Evaluation of 2 FDA-Approved Fentanyl Immunoassays against LC-MS/MS Reference.
    Author: Militello L, Gqamana PP, McLean B, Laurey J, Rudy D, McMaster JM, Zhang YV.
    Journal: J Appl Lab Med; 2024 Sep 03; 9(5):877-885. PubMed ID: 39001780.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, has caused many recent overdose deaths. Diagnosis of fentanyl abuse is not served by traditional opiate assays due to differences in chemical structure between synthetics and natural opioids. To our knowledge, this is the first study that uses liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as the reference method to evaluate and compare the ARK Fentanyl II Assay (ARK II) and the Fentanyl II Enzyme Immunoassay by Roche (FEN2). The ARK II is designed to detect fentanyl in urine samples, whereas the FEN2 is designed to detect norfentanyl, which is the major metabolite. METHODS: Two hundred patient urine samples including 100 positive and 100 negative samples according to an in-house LC-MS/MS assay were selected for the study. These samples were tested using the ARK II and the FEN2 to determine their performances relative to LC-MS/MS results. RESULTS: The FEN2 showed a positive and negative predictive value of 100% and 97% and a concordance with LC-MS/MS of 98.5% (kappa 0.97). The ARK II showed a positive and negative predictive value of 100% and 95% and a concordance with LC-MS/MS of 97.5% (kappa 0.95). Additionally, the FEN2 accurately identified 9 positive samples with a range of fentanyl concentrations from 0 to 18 ng/mL for which norfentanyl levels were less than the cutoff of 5 ng/mL, indicating potentially greater sensitivity than otherwise stated. CONCLUSIONS: The FEN2 and the ARK II were evaluated to be similar in terms of positive and negative predictive value during the analysis of 200 patient samples, as well as equally concordant with the LC-MS/MS reference, despite differences in design.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]