These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Effectiveness of secukinumab in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a European routine-care observational study. Author: Christiansen SN, Horskjær Rasmussen S, Ostergaard M, Pons M, Michelsen B, Pavelka K, Codreanu C, Ciurea A, Glintborg B, Santos MJ, Sari I, Rotar Z, Gudbjornsson B, Macfarlane GJ, Relas H, Iannone F, Laas K, Wallman JK, van de Sande M, Provan SA, Castrejon I, Zavada J, Mogosan C, Nissen MJ, Loft AG, Barcelos A, Erez Y, Pirkmajer KP, Grondal G, Jones GT, Hokkanen AM, Chimenti MS, Vorobjov S, Di Giuseppe D, Kvien TK, Otero-Varela L, van der Horst-Bruinsma I, Hetland ML, Ørnbjerg LM. Journal: RMD Open; 2024 Jul 24; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 39053949. Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To compare the treatment effectiveness of secukinumab in radiographic (r) versus non-radiographic (nr) axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients treated in routine care across Europe. METHODS: Prospectively collected data on secukinumab-treated axSpA patients with known radiographic status were pooled from nine countries.Remission rates based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs; Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), for example, pain ≤2/Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ≤2 and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease (ID) <1.3 after 6/12/24 months of secukinumab treatment were calculated.Remission and drug retention rates in r-axSpA versus nr-axSpA patients were compared by logistic and Cox regression models (unadjusted/adjusted for age+sex/adjusted for multiple confounders). RESULTS: Overall, 1161 secukinumab-treated patients were included (r-axSpA/nr-axSpA: 922/239). At baseline, r-axSpA patients had longer disease duration and higher C reactive protein, were more often male and HLA-B27 positive and had received fewer prior biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs compared with nr-axSpA patients, whereas PROs were largely similar.During follow-up, crude PRO remission rates were significantly higher in r-axSpA compared with nr-axSpA patients (6 months: pain≤2: 40%/28%, OR=1.7; BASDAI≤2: 37%/25%, OR=1.8), as were drug retention rates (24 months: 66%/58%, HR 0.73 (ref: r-axSpA)). Proportions of patients achieving ASDAS ID were low for both groups, particularly nr-axSpA (6 months: 11%/8%).However, when adjusting for age+sex, these differences diminished, and after adjusting for multiple confounders, no significant between-group differences remained for either remission or drug retention rates. CONCLUSION: Crude remission/drug retention rates in European secukinumab-treated patients were higher in r-axSpA compared with nr-axSpA patients. In adjusted analyses, secukinumab effectiveness was similar in both groups, suggesting that observed differences were related to factors other than radiographic status.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]