These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Development of an IMU based 2-segment foot model for an applicable medical gait analysis.
    Author: Bauer L, Hamberger MA, Böcker W, Polzer H, Baumbach SF.
    Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Jul 31; 25(1):606. PubMed ID: 39085824.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The two most commonly instrumented gait analysis tools used are Optical Motion Capture systems (OMC) and Inertial Measurement Units (IMU). To date, OMC based gait analysis is considered the gold-standard. Still, it is space-, cost-, and time-intense. On the other hand IMU systems are more cost- and time effective but simulate the whole foot as a single segment. To get a more detailed model of the foot and ankle, a new 2-segment foot model using IMU was developed, comparable to the multi-segment foot models assessed by OMC. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can an IMU based 2-segment foot model be developed to provide a more detailed representation of the foot and ankle kinematics? METHODS: To establish a 2-segment foot model, in addition to the previous 1-segment foot model an IMU sensor was added to the calcaneus. This allowed the differentiation between the hindfoot and forefoot kinematics. 30 healthy individuals (mean age 27 ± 7 years) were recruited to create a norm data set of a healthy cohort. Moreover, the kinematic data of the 2-segment foot model were compared to those of the traditional 1-segment foot model using statistical parametric mapping. RESULTS: The 2-segment foot model proved to be applicable. Furthermore, it allowed for a more detailed representation of the foot and ankle joints, similar to other multi-segment foot model. The healthy cohort's norm data set showed a homogeneous motion pattern for gait. CONCLUSION: The 2-segment foot model allows for an extension of IMU-based gait analysis. Futures studies must prove the reliability and validity of the 2-segment foot model in healthy and pathologic situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]