These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The independent effects of hydrostatic pressure and hypercapnic breathing during water immersion on ventilatory sensitivity and cerebrovascular reactivity.
    Author: Sackett JR, Schlader ZJ, Hostler D, Johnson BD.
    Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2024 Oct 01; 327(4):R457-R472. PubMed ID: 39133779.
    Abstract:
    Head-out water immersion (HOWI) induces ventilatory and hemodynamic changes, which may be a result of hydrostatic pressure, augmented arterial CO2 tension, or a combination of both. We hypothesized that the hydrostatic pressure and elevated CO2 tension that occur during HOWI will contribute to an augmented ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 and an attenuated cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 during water immersion. Twelve subjects [age: 24 ± 3 yr, body mass index (BMI): 25 ± 3 kg/m2] completed HOWI, waist water immersion with CO2 (WWI + CO2), and WWI, where a rebreathing test was conducted at baseline, 10, 30, and 60 min, and postimmersion. End-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]), minute ventilation, expired gases, blood pressure, heart rate, and middle cerebral artery blood velocity were recorded continuously. [Formula: see text] increased throughout all visits (P ≤ 0.011), was similar during HOWI and WWI + CO2 (P ≥ 0.264), and was greater during WWI + CO2 versus WWI at 10, 30, and 60 min (P < 0.001). When HOWI vs. WWI + CO2 were compared, the change in ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 was different at 10 (0.59 ± 0.34 vs. 0.06 ± 0.23 L/min/mmHg; P < 0.001), 30 (0.58 ± 0.46 vs. 0.15 ± 0.25 L/min/mmHg; P < 0.001), and 60 min (0.63 ± 0.45 vs. 0.16 ± 0.34 L/min/mmHg; P < 0.001), whereas there were no differences between conditions for cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 (P ≥ 0.163). When WWI + CO2 versus WWI were compared, ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 was not different between conditions (P ≥ 0.642), whereas the change in cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 was different at 30 min (-0.56 ± 0.38 vs. -0.30 ± 0.25 cm/s/mmHg; P = 0.010). These data indicate that during HOWI, ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 increases due to the hydrostatic pressure, whereas cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 decreases due to the combined effects of immersion.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Although not fully elucidated, the ventilatory and hemodynamic alterations during water immersion appear to be a result of the combined effects of immersion (i.e., elevated [Formula: see text], central hypervolemia, increased cerebral perfusion, increased work of breathing, etc.). Our findings demonstrate that an augmented ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 during immersion may be due to the hydrostatic pressure across the chest wall, whereas an attenuated cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 may be due to the combined effects of immersion.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]