These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical utility of ambulatory ECG monitoring and 2D-ventricular strain for evaluation of post-COVID-19 ventricular arrhythmia.
    Author: Hamdy RM, Samy M, Mohamed HS.
    Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2024 Aug 16; 24(1):429. PubMed ID: 39148011.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: A relatively common complication of COVID -19 infection is arrhythmia. There is limited information about myocardial deformation and heart rate variability (HRV) in symptomatic post COVID patients presented by ventricular arrhythmia. AIM OF THE STUDY: Our goal was to assess 2D-ventricular strain and heart rate variability indices (evaluated by ambulatory ECG monitoring) in post-COVID-19 patients suffering from ventricular arrhythmia. METHODS: The current observational case-control study performed on 60 patients one month after they had recovered from the COVID-19 infection. Thirty healthy volunteers served as the control group. Each participant had a full medical history review, blood tests, a 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG), 24-h ambulatory ECG monitoring, and an echo-Doppler examination to evaluate the left ventricular (LV) dimensions, tissue Doppler velocities, and 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) for both the LV and right ventricular (RV) strain. RESULTS: Symptomatic post-COVID patients with monomorphic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) showed a substantial impairment of LV/RV systolic and diastolic functions, LV/RV myocardial performance (MPI) with reduced indices of HRV. Patients with higher versus lower ventricular burden had poorer functional status, higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers and reduced parameters of HRV (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class: 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 1.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001, C-reactive protein (CRP): 13.3 ± 4.1 vs. 8.3 ± 5.9 mg/L, p < 0.0001, low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF): 3.6 ± 2.4 vs. 2.2 ± 1.2, p < 0.002, the root mean square of the difference between successive normal intervals (rMSSD): 21.8 ± 4.7 vs. 29.3 ± 14.9 ms, p < 0.039 and the standard deviation of the RR interval (SDNN): 69.8 ± 19.1 vs.108.8 ± 37.4 ms, p < 0.0001). The ventricular burden positively correlated with neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (r = 0.33, p < 0.001), CRP (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001), while it negatively correlated with LV-global longitudinal strain (GLS) (r = -0.38, p < 0.0001), and RV-GLS (r = -0.37, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with post-COVID symptoms presented by ventricular arrhythmia had poor functional status. Patients with post-COVID symptoms and ventricular arrhythmia had subclinical myocardial damage, evidenced by speckle tracking echocardiography while having apparently preserved LV systolic function. The burden of ventricular arrhythmia in post-COVID patients significantly correlated with increased inflammatory biomarkers and reduced biventricular strain.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]