MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: [Comprehensive therapy of traditional Chinese medicine for erectile dysfunction with damp-heat stasis: A clinical observation of 103 cases].
Author: Yao JC, Ju BJ, Li X, Li LY, Ma MM, Zhang YT.
Journal: Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2024 Mar; 30(3):233-240. PubMed ID: 39177390.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effect and safety of comprehensive therapy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) with damp-heat stasis. METHODS: We selected 108 cases of ED with damp-heat stasis meeting the inclusion criteria and treated with tadalafil (the control group, n = 54) or tadalafil + comprehensive TCM therapy (the trial group, n = 54) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine in the same period. After 8 weeks of treatment, we recorded the patients' scores on IIEF-5, TCM syndrome, erectile quality (EQS), 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Scale 7 (GAD-7). At 16 weeks of our study, we collected the efficacy parameters, safety indicators and adverse reactions by telephone follow-up and compared the data obtained between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: Totally, 103 of the patients completed the study, 51 in the control and 52 in the trial group. Compared with the baseline, the IIEF-5 and EQS scores were both markedly increased after 8 weeks of treatment in the trial group (12.35±3.00 vs 18.36±2.82, P< 0.05; 39.5 ［30.25－43］ vs 67.5 ［54.5－76.75］, P< 0.05) and the control (11.96±2.79 vs 15.88±3.86, P< 0.05; 38.0 ［29－42］ vs 56 ［49－64］, P< 0.05), even more significantly in the former than in the latter (P< 0.05); the TCM syndrome and GAD-7 scores were remarkably decreased in the trial (9.5 ［8－12］ vs 4.0 ［2.25－5］, P< 0.05; 5 ［2.25－6.75］ vs 2.5 ［1－4.75］, P< 0.05) and the control group (10.0 ［8－12］ vs 5.0 ［3－6］, P< 0.05; 5.0 ［3－6］ vs 4.0 ［2－5］, P< 0.05), even more significantly in the former than in the latter (P< 0.05), so were the PHQ-9 scores (P< 0.05), but with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The IIEF-5 scores of the two groups remained significantly higher than the baseline during the follow-up (P< 0.05), even higher in the trial than in the control group (17.04±2.60 vs 14.16±3.34, P< 0.05). No obvious abnormal safety indicators or adverse events were observed during the study. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive TCM therapy combined with tadalafil is superior to tadalafil alone in the treatment of ED with damp-heat stasis, and has a better long-term efficacy and a higher safety.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]