These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Age and initial position affect movement biomechanics in sit to walk transitions: Whole body balance and trunk control. Author: Miller MF, van der Kruk E, Silverman AK. Journal: J Biomech; 2024 Oct; 175():112256. PubMed ID: 39191074. Abstract: Maintaining dynamic balance during transitional movements like sit-to-walk (STW) can be challenging for older adults. Age-related neuromuscular decline can alter movement in STW, such as rising with greater trunk flexion, narrowing the feet, or using arms to push off. Initial foot and arm position can affect subsequent movement biomechanics, with different ground reaction forces (GRFs) that stabilize and advance the body center of mass (COM). The purpose of this study was to quantify whole-body biomechanics and trunk control of STW transitions. Fifteen younger adults (18-35 years) and fifteen older adults (50-79 years) performed STW from four initial foot positions and two arm positions. Three-dimensional (3D) GRFs, 3D body COM displacement, and integrated electromyography values from the lumbar paraspinals and gluteus medius were evaluated. Younger adults generated greater mediolateral GRF ranges while rising, whereas older adults generated greater mediolateral GRF ranges when stepping forward suggesting different strategies to laterally control the body COM. Initial foot position affected the STW movement, with narrow foot positions having smaller body COM displacement than wide foot positions, associated with smaller medial GRFs to move the body COM toward the stance limb. Rising with arm support required less lumbar paraspinal excitation, which was further reduced when with a posteriorly offset foot. Gluteus medius activity was greater for older adults compared to younger adults in STW. Completing STW with arm support can reduce the muscle activity required to stabilize the torso when rising, which likely has implications for balance control and low back loading.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]