These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of Three Different Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) Criteria and Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Antithrombin Investigation in Patients with Confirmed Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (SIC).
    Author: Wei Q, Wang M, Peng X, Yang J, Niu T.
    Journal: Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2024; 30():10760296241271334. PubMed ID: 39196070.
    Abstract:
    A new scoring system termed sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) has been proposed to diagnose early sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). This study performed DIC-related analyses in patients with confirmed SIC. Data from the intensive care unit (ICU) departments of the three hospitals between 2020 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Finally, 125 patients with confirmed SIC were enrolled in the study. The diagnostic value of three widely used DIC criteria was assessed in patients with newly diagnosed SIC. In addition, the diagnostic and prognostic value of antithrombin (AT) was analyzed in patients with SIC. The Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC criteria (JAAM) exhibited the highest DIC diagnostic rate, while the mortality risk of SIC patients demonstrated a proportional increase with higher International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS) scores. Low AT activity (<70%) in septic patients upon SIC diagnosis predicted a very high 28-day mortality rate, almost twice as high as in the normal AT activity (≥70%) group. A decreasing tendency in AT activity after clinical interventions was correlated with increased mortality. The area under the ROC curve (AU-ROC) of AT in DIC diagnosis was statistically significant when CDSS and ISTH were used as diagnostic criteria, but not JAAM. Each of the three DIC diagnostic criteria showed diagnostic and prognostic advantages for SIC. AT could be an independent prognostic indicator for SIC but demonstrated a relatively limited DIC diagnostic value. Adding AT to the SIC scoring system may increase its prognostic power.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]