These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Exertion isotope tests in coronary insufficiency. Comparison with isotopic ventriculography and myocardial scintigraphy].
    Author: Amor M, Verdaguer M, Karcher G, Ethévenot G, Godenir JP, Hocquard C, Georges F, Cherrier F, Bertrand A, Faivre G.
    Journal: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1985 Jan; 78(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 3919680.
    Abstract:
    Very few studies have been described comparing the value of exercise myocardial scintigraphy and left ventricular angioscintigraphy. The authors designed a study comparing these two investigations with conventional exercise stress testing and coronary angiography. The isotopic investigations were carried out within 48 hours of coronary angiography. A total of 143 patients undergoing coronary angiography (35 normal, 108 coronary patients: 36 single vessel, 36 double vessel and 36 triple vessel disease) were included in this study. The lesions were located of the LAD (77 cases), left circumflex (77 cases) and right coronary arteries (62). The sensitivity and specificity of both radionuclide investigations were evaluated to assess their diagnostic value; the best results were obtained with myocardial scintigraphy (sensitivity 86 p. 100; specificity 100 p. 100); angioscintigraphy had a sensitivity of 71 p. 100 and specificity of 97 p. 100, and conventional exercise stress testing of 42 p. 100 and 70 p. 100 respectively. The sensitivity seemed to increase with the degree of stenosis; although the sensitivity of myocardial scintigraphy increased progressively, that of angioscintigraphy doubled in cases of stenosis 90 p. 100 (stenosis less than 90 p. 100, sensitivity = 37 p. 100; stenosis greater than 90 p. 100, sensitivity = 73 p. 100). The sensitivity of myocardial scintigraphy with respect to the severity of the coronary artery disease was best in cases of right coronary artery stenosis (sensitivity in cases of RCA stenosis = 74 p. 100; sensitivity in LAD stenosis = 58 p. 100; sensitivity in left circumflex stenosis = 43 p. 100). The sensitivity of left ventricular angioscintigraphy was best in LAD stenosis (RCA stenosis = 50 p. 100, LAD stenosis = 64 p. 100, left circumflex stenosis = 36 p. 100). The sensitivity of both investigations was poor in left circumflex artery stenosis even when severely diseased. The sensitivity of both investigations was better in diffuse coronary artery disease: myocardial scintigraphy (single vessel disease: 72 p. 100, double vessel disease: 92 p. 100, triple vessel disease: 94 p. 100), left ventricular angioscintigraphy (61 p. 100, 69 p. 100, and 83 p. 100 respectively). Although the association of these two radioisotopic investigations does not improve diagnostic sensitivity, it does provide more information about the localisation and extension of the coronary artery disease especially in LAD and right coronary artery stenosis. These results suggest that these investigations are complementary in the evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]