These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Construction of platelet count-optical method reflex test rules using Micro-RBC#, Macro-RBC%, "PLT clumps?" flag, and "PLT abnormal histogram" flag on the Mindray BC-6800plus hematology analyzer in clinical practice.
    Author: Fei Y, Xiong ZG, Huang L, Zhang C.
    Journal: Clin Chem Lab Med; 2024 Sep 02; ():. PubMed ID: 39217753.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Utilizing RBC or PLT-related parameters to establish rules for the PLT-O reflex test can assist laboratories in quickly identifying specimens with interfered PLT-I that require PLT-O retesting. METHODS: Prospective PLT-I and PLT-O testing was performed on 6857 EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood samples, split randomly into training and validation cohorts at a 2:3 ratio. Reflex and non-reflex groups were distinguished based on the differences between PLT-I and PLT-O results. By comparing RBC and PLT parameter differences and flags in the training set, we pinpointed factors linked to PLT-O reflex testing. Utilizing Lasso regression, then refining through univariate and multivariate logistic regression, candidate parameters were selected. A predictive nomogram was constructed from these parameters and subsequently validated using the validation set. ROC curves were also plotted. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the reflex and non-reflex groups for 19 parameters including RBC, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW-CV, RDW-SD, Micro-RBC#, Micro-RBC%, Macro-RBC#, Macro-RBC%, MPV, PCT, P-LCC, P-LCR, PLR,"PLT clumps?" flag, "PLT abnormal histogram" flag, "IDA Anemia?" flag, and "RBC abnormal histogram" flag. After further analysis, Micro-RBC#, Macro-RBC%,"PLT clumps?", and "PLT abnormal histogram" flag were identified as candidate parameters to develop a nomogram with an AUC of 0.636 (95 %CI: 0.622-0.650), sensitivity of 42.9 % (95 %CI: 37.8-48.1 %), and specificity of 90.5 % (95 %C1: 89.6-91.3 %). CONCLUSIONS: The established rules may help laboratories improve efficiency and increase accuracy in determining platelet counts as a supplement to ICSH41 guidelines.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]