These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative analysis of hepatic fat quantification across 5 T, 3 T and 1.5 T: A study on consistency and feasibility.
    Author: Liu J, Wang Z, Yu D, Yang Y, Li Z, Wang X, Yang Y, Cheng C, Zou C, Gan J.
    Journal: Eur J Radiol; 2024 Nov; 180():111709. PubMed ID: 39222564.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a critical noninvasive technique for evaluating liver steatosis, with efficient and precise fat quantification being essential for diagnosing liver diseases. This study leverages 5 T ultra-high-field MRI to demonstrate the clinical significance of liver fat quantification, and explores the consistency and accuracy of the Proton Density Fat Fraction (PDFF) in the liver across different magnetic field strengths and measurement methodologies. METHODS: The study involved phantoms with lipid contents ranging from 0 % to 30 % and 35 participants (21 females, 14 males; average age 30.17 ± 13.98 years, body mass index 25.84 ± 4.76, waist-hip ratio 0.84 ± 0.09). PDFF measurements were conducted using chemical shift encoded (CSE) MRI at 5 T, 3 T, and 1.5 T, alongside magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) at 5 T and 1.5 T for both liver and phantoms, analyzed using jMRUI software. The MRS-derived PDFF values served as the reference standard. Repeatability of 5 T MRI measurements was assessed through correlation analysis, while accuracy was evaluated using linear regression analysis against the reference standards. RESULTS: The CSE-PDFF measurements at 5 T demonstrated strong consistency with those at 3 T and 1.5 T, showing high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.988 and 0.980, respectively (all p < 0.001). There was also significant consistency across ROIs within liver lobes, with ICC values ranging from 0.975 to 0.986 (all p < 0.001). MRS-PDFF measurements for both phantoms and liver at 5 T and 1.5 T exhibited substantial agreement, with ICC values of 0.996 and 0.980, respectively (all p < 0.001). Particularly, ICC values for ROIs in the liver ranged from 0.963 to 0.990 (all p < 0.001). Despite overall agreement, statistically significant differences were noted in specific ROIs within the liver lobes (p = 0.004 and 0.012). The CSE and MRS PDFF measurements at 5 T displayed strong consistency, with an ICC of 0.988 (p < 0.001), and significant agreement was also found between 5 T CSE and 1.5 T MRS PDFF measurements, with an ICC of 0.978 (p < 0.001). Agreement was significant within the ROIs of the liver lobes on the same platform at 5 T, with ICC values ranging from 0.986 to 0.991 (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PDFF measurements at 5 T MR imaging exhibited both accuracy and repeatability, indicating that 5 T imaging provides reliable quantification of liver fat content and shows substantial potential for clinical diagnostic applications.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]