These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Craniomandibular variation in the endemic Hispaniolan primate, Antillothrix bernensis.
    Author: Halenar-Price LB, Klukkert ZS, Almonte-Milán JN, Lehman P, Sims ZR, Cooke SB.
    Journal: J Hum Evol; 2024 Nov; 196():103589. PubMed ID: 39353263.
    Abstract:
    Here we describe new fossil material of Antillothrix bernensis, a Pleistocene-Holocene primate taxon from Hispaniola. It is now represented by seven crania, five mandibles, and dozens of postcranial elements from several paleontologically rich cave systems. The five adult crania included here share a similar overall profile as well as specific features such as a deep depression at the glabella. The complete anterior dentition of Antillothrix can now be described for the first time; short canine crowns, in the apicobasal dimension, compare well with titi monkeys, but the new crania and mandibles lack the specialized tall-crowned incisors of the extant pitheciids. They do, however, have a diastema between the lateral maxillary incisors and canines, a feature not present in the previously known crania. The new mandibles deepen posteriorly and have a medial inflection of the mandibular ramus, as in some pitheciids, but also share with Xenothrix a significant vertical narrowing of the corpus under P4/M1 not observed among extant taxa. Two of the specimens, a cranium and a mandible that do not fit together, exhibit congenitally absent third molars-a rarity among extant, noncallitrichine taxa. There is an approximately 1-kg range in the estimated body mass among the full Antillothrix sample (from 2.4 to 3.4 kg), as well as a range of approximately 5 cm3 of endocranial volume (from 40 to 45 cm3). With these extended ranges from the new specimens, Antillothrix can no longer be described as a taxon with a brain size smaller than that expected for its body size. Neither of these ranges in the brain size or body size is large enough to indicate a substantial level of sexual dimorphism or to necessitate separating the sample into male and female individuals. Given this, and the similar canine sizes for all specimens where they are present, the sample is consistent with a morphologically variable but monomorphic species.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]