These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Palatal relaxing incisions versus nasopharyngeal relaxing incisions in Palatoplasty.
    Author: Elayah SA, Wu M, Younis H, Sakran KA, Al-Attab R, Alsaidi R, Alawadhi N, Li Y, Shi B.
    Journal: Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Oct 04; 28(10):568. PubMed ID: 39365336.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Bone denudation after conventional relaxing incisions could be a critical factor in inhibiting maxillofacial growth. To address this, alternative relaxing incisions were designed. Thus, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of palatal relaxing incisions versus nasopharyngeal relaxing incisions in enhancing postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, involving a total of 120 patients divided into three groups: 40 patients have received modified Furlow palatoplasty with nasopharyngeal relaxing incisions (M.F + N.P.I palatoplasty), and 40 patients who received modified Furlow palatoplasty with palatal relaxing incisions (M.F + P.R.I palatoplasty). The other 40 patients received original Furlow palatoplasty without relaxing incisions (F palatoplasty). Data collected included gender, cleft type, cleft width, age at repair, velopharyngeal function, presence of palatal fistula, and follow-up. The chi-square test compared frequencies of sex, cleft type, postoperative fistula, and velopharyngeal outcomes across groups. The Mann-Whitney and independent t-tests compared mean values, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean age at repair was similar across groups, with follow-up periods ranging from 5 to 11 years. No significant differences were found among the M.F + N.P.I and M.F + P.L.I groups regarding gender, cleft type, cleft width, and age at repair. However, the F group had a significantly narrowest cleft width compared to the other groups. Postoperative outcomes showed no significant differences in velopharyngeal function among the three groups, but the F group had a significantly higher rate of palatal fistula (32.5%) compared to the M.F + P.L.I (10%) and M.F + N.P.I (7.5%) groups. A comparison of the two modified Furlow techniques revealed no significant differences in velopharyngeal closure rates or the incidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency and persistent palatal fistula across different Veau classifications. CONCLUSIONS: While both incisions showed similar impacts on palatoplasty outcomes, palatal relaxing incisions may expose more bone and pose a higher risk of secondary healing issues. Therefore, nasopharyngeal relaxing incisions are recommended as an effective and potentially preferable technique in palatoplasty whenever feasible. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The current study suggests that, whenever feasible, nasopharyngeal relaxing incisions are advised as an effective and potentially superior technique in palatoplasty.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]