These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Association between self-care activities and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Northwest Ethiopia general hospitals : a multicenter cross-sectional study.
    Author: Wondm SA, Zeleke TK, Dagnew SB, Moges TA, Tarekegn GY, Belachew EA, Tamene FB.
    Journal: Sci Rep; 2024 Oct 05; 14(1):23198. PubMed ID: 39369010.
    Abstract:
    Diabetes self-care activities are essential for achieving optimal glycemic control. However, little investigation has been conducted in Ethiopia to evaluate the relationship between the rate glycemic controland self-care activities among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, this study was conducted to assess self -care activities and their association with glycemic control among patients with T2DM in Northwest Ethiopia general hospitals. This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in Northwest Ethiopia general hospitals diabetic clinics. Diabetes self-care activities were measured using the Amharic version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA-Amharic). Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were used to assess the rate of glycemic control. A linear regression model was used to identify predictors of self-care activities and glycemic control. P-value of <  0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI)  was considerd as statistically significant. Of 413 participants included in the final analysis, two-thirds (66.3%) had poor glycemic control, with a mean HbA1c of 7.94% (SD = 1.75). Blood glucose testing was the most important self-care activity domain for predicting better glycemic control [β=-0.36, 95% CI (-0.48, -0.24); P = 0.0001] followed by diet [β=-0.29, 95% CI (-0.39, -0.083); P = 0.0001], foot-care [β=-0.28, 95% CI (-0.3, -0.061); P = 0.003], and physical activity [β=-0.27, 95% CI (-0.29, -0.056); P = 0.004], respectively. Moreover, unable to read and write [β = 0.72, 95% CI (0.57, 3.8); P = 0.037], overweight [β = 0.32, 95% CI (0.011, 0.62); P = 0.042], obesity [β = 0.67, 95% CI (0.39, 0.94); P = 0.0001], and low level of medication adherence [β = 0.7, 95% CI (0.39, 1.1); P = 0.0001] were significant predictors of poor glycemic control.       Previous diabetes education [β=-0.88, 95% CI (-1.2, -0.57); P=0.0001] was a significant predictor of good glycemic control. The prevalence of poor glycemic control and poor self-care activities were high among patients with T2DM. Self-care activities were independent predictors of glycemic control among patients with T2DM. Therefore, management interventions for patients with T2DM should focus on improving self-care activities and other predictor variables.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]