These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Multi-omics PGT: re-evaluation of euploid blastocysts for implantation potential based on RNA sequencing.
    Author: Jin J, Ma J, Wang X, Hong F, Zhang Y, Zhou F, Wan C, Zou Y, Yang J, Lu S, Tong X.
    Journal: Hum Reprod; 2024 Dec 01; 39(12):2861-2872. PubMed ID: 39413437.
    Abstract:
    STUDY QUESTION: In addition to chromosomal euploidy, can the transcriptome of blastocysts be used as a novel predictor of embryo implantation potential? SUMMARY ANSWER: This retrospective analysis showed that based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between euploid blastocysts which resulted and did not result in a clinical pregnancy, machine learning models could help improve implantation rates by blastocyst optimization. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Embryo implantation is a multifaceted process, with implantation loss and pregnancy failure related not only to blastocyst euploidy but also to the intricate dialog between blastocyst and endometrium. Although in vitro studies have revealed the characteristics of trophectoderm (TE) differentiation in implanted blastocysts and the function of TE placentation at the implantation site, the precise molecular mechanisms of embryo implantation and their clinical application remain to be fully elucidated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study involved 102 patients who underwent 111 cycles for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) between March 2022 and July 2023. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study included 412 blastocysts biopsied at Day 5 [D5] or Day 6 [D6] for patients who underwent PGT-A. The biopsy lysates were split and subjected to DNA and RNA sequencing (DNA- and RNA-seq). One part was used for PGT-A to detect DNA copy number variations, whereas the other part was assessed simultaneously by RNA-seq to determine the transcriptome characteristics. To validate the reliability and accuracy of RNA-seq obtained from this strategy, we initially analyzed the transcriptome of blastocysts with chromosomal aneuploidies. Subsequently, we compared the transcriptomic features of blastocysts with different rates of formation (D5 vs D6) and investigated the network of interactions between key blastulation genes and the receptive endometrium. Then to evaluate the implantation potential of euploid blastocysts, we identified DEGs between euploid blastocysts that resulted in clinical pregnancy (defined as the presence of a gestational sac detected by ultrasound after 5 weeks) and those that did not. These DEGs were then employed to construct a predictive model for optimizing blastocyst selection. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The successful detection rate of PGT-A was remarkably high at 99.8%. The RNA data may infer aneuploidy for both trisomy and monosomy. Between the euploid blastocysts that formed on D5 and D6, 187 DEGs were predominantly involved in cell differentiation for embryonic placenta development, the PPAR signaling pathway, and the Notch signaling pathway. These D5/D6 DEGs also exhibited a functional dialog with the receptive phase endometrium-specific genes through protein-protein interaction networks, indicating that the embryo undergoes further differentiation for post-implantation development. Furthermore, a modeling strategy using 280 DEGs between blastocysts leading to successful clinical pregnancies or failing to produce clinical pregnancies was implemented to refine the euploid embryo optimization, achieving areas under the curves of 0.88, 0.71, and 0.84 for the random forest (RF), support vector machine, and linear discriminant analysis models, respectively. Finally, a retrospective analysis of 83 transferred euploid blastocysts using the RF model identified three types of euploid embryos with a decreasing trend in implantation potential. Notably, the implantation rate of the good group was significantly higher than that of the moderate group (88.6% vs 50.0% P = 0.001) and that of the moderate group was higher than that of the poor group (50.0% vs 20.8%, P = 0.035). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size was insufficient; thus, a prospective study is needed to verify the clinical effectiveness of the above model. Because we did not analyze blastocysts that led only to biochemical pregnancies but failed clinical pregnancies separately, our classification system still must be modified to screen these embryos. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Transcriptomic analysis of blastocysts offers a novel approach for predicting embryo implantation potential, which can be utilized to optimize clinical embryo selection. The ranking system may be effective in reducing the times and costs involved in achieving a clinical pregnancy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the "Pioneer" and "Leading Goose" R&D Program of Zhejiang (No. 2023C03034), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82101709), and the National Key Research and Development Program for Young Scientists of China (No. 2022YFC2702300). The authors state no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]