These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Assessment of interlobar variation of bronchoalveolar lavage cellular differentials in interstitial lung diseases.
    Author: Garcia JG, Wolven RG, Garcia PL, Keogh BA.
    Journal: Am Rev Respir Dis; 1986 Mar; 133(3):444-9. PubMed ID: 3954253.
    Abstract:
    Alveolitis is thought to precede permanent lung derangement in a variety of interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cell differentials can be used to evaluate the intensity of alveolitis, whereas clinical, roentgenographic, and functional studies are insensitive monitors of lung inflammation. As ILD is generally diffuse, unilobar lavage is widely used and presumed to gauge overall lung inflammation. Consistency of lobe to lobe cell differential findings has not been systematically addressed. We analyzed 53 bilateral lobar lavages (right middle lobe and lingula) in 34 patients with sarcoidosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis-collagen vascular disease (IPF-CV) and a group of mixed interstitial diseases. Cellular differentials from each lobe were independently assessed and compared. The sarcoid group, with predominantly T-lymphocytes in BAL, showed excellent interlobar correlation (r = 0.92, p less than 0.001), with only 17% showing a discrepancy of greater than 10% in percentage of T-lymphocytes. In contrast, the IPF-CV group, with predominantly neutrophils in BAL, showed good interlobar correlation (r = 0.79; p less than 0.01), but 35% had a greater than 10% discrepancy in percentage of neutrophils. Finally, the mixed group, with lymphocytes as the predominant cell in BAL, showed poor interlobar correlation (r = 0.58; p greater than 0.10), with 42% showing a greater than 10% discrepancy in percentage of lymphocytes. These results were not explicable on the basis of differences in volume of lavage fluid or total cells recovered, these parameters being remarkably consistent between lobes in the 3 patient groups and in a control group of 8 subjects without ILD. The chest roentgenogram was markedly insensitive to lavage interlobar variation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]