These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Comparison of the diagnostic methods used in maxillofacial trauma. Author: Finkle DR, Ringler SL, Luttenton CR, Beernink JH, Peterson NT, Dean RE. Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg; 1985 Jan; 75(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 3966105. Abstract: A prospective study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic methods used in acute maxillofacial trauma. Clinical examination, routine facial x-rays with linear tomography, and computer tomography were compared in 49 patients. Computer tomography was found to be the most accurate test in the diagnosis of facial bone injury, especially complex fractures. Computer tomography also provided valuable information regarding soft-tissue injury of the face. The radiation doses of linear tomography and computer tomography were calculated to be below the level known to cause cataract formation. Computer tomography is a safe, reliable adjunct in the diagnosis of acute maxillofacial trauma and should be strongly considered after initial screening measures are completed.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]