These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves.
    Author: Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, Gill CC, Golding LA, Stewart RW, Loop FD, Williams GW.
    Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 89(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 3974271.
    Abstract:
    The bovine pericardial valve and the SupraAnnular valve have been developed to improve the hemodynamic function of tissue valves. Hemodynamic performances of the standard Carpentier-Edwards porcine valve, the Carpentier-Edwards SupraAnnular valve, and the Carpentier-Edwards bovine pericardial valve were compared in the aortic position. One hundred patients undergoing aortic valve replacement were studied intraoperatively. Mean gradient across the valve decreased for standard and pericardial valves as valve size increased. At the same flow rate, the 23 mm pericardial valve had larger valve orifice areas, higher performance indices, and lower gradients than the 23 mm SupraAnnular valve. The SupraAnnular valve is hemodynamically superior to the standard Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis. The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve, however, is less obstructive in the aortic position than either of the porcine valves.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]