These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of cholinergic agonists on muscle from rodent proximal and distal small intestine.
    Author: Nowak TV, Harrington B.
    Journal: Gastroenterology; 1985 May; 88(5 Pt 1):1118-25. PubMed ID: 3979743.
    Abstract:
    Proximal and distal rat small intestine was cut into strips measuring 6.0 X 10.0 mm. Strips cut along the oral-caudal axis were called longitudinal strips, whereas those cut 90 degrees to that axis were called circular strips. Stress in circular and longitudinal muscle strips was measured continuously as they were superfused with acetylcholine, carbamylcholine, methacholine, bethanechol, or physostigmine. Resting stress during stretch, acetylcholine-stimulated active stress, and total stress were determined. Proximal circular muscle was five times as sensitive to acetylcholine as distal circular muscle (p less than 0.05); proximal longitudinal muscle was 2.8 times as sensitive to bethanechol as distal muscle (p less than 0.05). Resting, active, and total stress were similar in proximal and distal muscle, but circular muscle showed nearly twice the resting stress of longitudinal muscle at either proximal or distal sites (p less than 0.05). Physostigmine (10(-6) M) increased acetylcholine-stimulated active stress in proximal and distal circular muscle by 29% and 70%, respectively (p less than 0.05), but not in longitudinal muscle (p greater than 0.05). This difference between proximal and distal circular muscle (41%) was also significant (p less than 0.05). Thus, the proximal and distal muscle of the rat small intestine differs in its sensitivity to various cholinergic agonists, but not in its length-stress properties.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]