These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Error due to dead-space admixture in single-breath method for estimation of pulmonary blood flow.
    Author: Grønlund J, Christensen P.
    Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985); 1985 Mar; 58(3):1034-9. PubMed ID: 3980375.
    Abstract:
    The single-breath method of Kim et al. (J. Appl. Physiol. 21: 1338-1344, 1966) for the estimation of pulmonary blood flow is based on a single-alveolus lung model for which an analytical relationship has been established between the kinetic behavior of the alveolar O2 and CO2 tensions and the pulmonary blood flow. The analysis is based on the assumption that the dead-space contribution to the expirate is negligible after expiration of a predefined volume. We have examined the influence of this assumption on the estimation of pulmonary blood flow by computer simulation in a lung model that incorporates deadspace contribution to the expirate. Data on the fractional contribution of the dead space to the expired gas were obtained from Tsunoda et al.'s study (J. Appl. Physiol. 32: 644-649, 1972) on the emptying pattern of normal adult lungs. The results show that failure to take account of the dead-space contribution can cause an underestimation in the pulmonary blood flow of greater than 30%. The error can be reduced by ignoring the first part of the expiration but only at the cost of an increase in the sensitivity of the single-breath method to measurement noise. This property of the system is demonstrated experimentally. The error due to dead-space admixture depends on the total volume of dead-space gas, the measurement noise, the pulmonary blood flow, and the emptying characteristics of the dead-space compartment during expiration. In normal subjects it is possible to optimize the experimental design so that the systematic error is less than 5% and the coefficient of variation is less than 10%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]