These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Sensitivity of cross-sectional echocardiography in detection of impaired global and regional left ventricular function: prospective study. Author: Erbel R, Schweizer P, Meyer J, Krebs W, Yalkinoglu O, Effert S. Journal: Int J Cardiol; 1985 Apr; 7(4):375-89. PubMed ID: 3988374. Abstract: In order to establish the sensitivity and specificity of cross-sectional echocardiography for detection of global and regional left ventricular function a prospective study was performed in 80 patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Twenty four hours before heart catheterization, cross-sectional echocardiograms were recorded in the apical RAO-equivalent view and high quality echocardiograms were obtained in 71/80 patients (89%). M-mode echocardiograms of the left ventricle could be performed in 56/71 patients (79%). Based on normal values sensitivity and specificity of cross-sectional echocardiography were calculated in comparison to cineventriculography. For fractional shortening (normal value greater than 25%) sensitivity measured 46% and specificity 93%, and when the E-point septal separation was measured (normal value less than 7 mm), sensitivity increased to 73% and specificity was 84%. For detection of increased end-diastolic volume (less than 155 ml) sensitivity reached 84% and specificity 98% and for increased end-systolic (less than 70 ml) volume it was 86 and 97%, respectively. A depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (greater than 49%) was found with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 100%. Regional left ventricular wall motion, analyzed by an area method, revealed for anterior wall motion a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 94%, whereas for posterior wall motion sensitivity reached 80% and specificity 96%. Regression equation between the number of pathological segments and left ventricular ejection fraction for cineventriculography was given by Y = -4.06 X + 73.4, r = 0.93 and for cross-sectional echocardiography by Y = -3.69 X + 62.6, r = 0.85. We conclude that cross-sectional echocardiography can be used as a screening method to detect impaired left ventricular function. It is superior to M-mode echocardiography. Reduced regional function of the posterior wall can be found with high sensitivity, but depressed motion of the anterior wall may be overlooked.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]