These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Hepatic metastases studied with MR and CT.
    Author: Heiken JP, Lee JK, Glazer HS, Ling D.
    Journal: Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):423-7. PubMed ID: 4011905.
    Abstract:
    Examinations of the liver using magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) were performed on 50 patients with hepatic metastases. MR and CT were comparable in their ability to detect metastases, which generally appeared hypointense compared with normal liver parenchyma on T1-weighted MR images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images. The MR imaging techniques that were most reliable in detecting metastases were inversion recovery and a relatively T2-weighted, spin-echo technique (TR = 1,500 msec, TE = 60 msec). We conclude that CT, because of its shorter imaging time, greater spatial resolution, and lower cost, should remain the preferred screening test for hepatic metastases. MR imaging should be reserved for patients with equivocal CT findings and for patients in whom there is persistent clinical suspicion of hepatic metastases despite a negative CT examination.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]