These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prospective, randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of netilmicin-clindamycin and tobramycin-clindamycin in the treatment of serious systemic infections.
    Author: Kahalley S, Chandler J, Hawkins J, Norris G, Waugespack R, Snow RM.
    Journal: Clin Ther; 1985; 7(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 4016829.
    Abstract:
    Fifty-three patients with documented or suspected mixed flora infections were randomly assigned to receive either netilmicin or tobramycin in combination with clindamycin. Data from 36 patients with 43 documented infections yielding 102 clinical isolates were evaluated for efficacy. In the 18 patients receiving netilmicin-clindamycin, 90% of the infections responded favorably and 96% of the pathogens were eliminated. In the 18 patients receiving tobramycin-clindamycin, 81% of the infections resolved and 88.5% of the pathogens were eliminated. Forty-nine patients were included in the safety analysis. The incidence of nephrotoxicity was similar in both groups (netilmicin, 20%; tobramycin, 21%). Auditory toxicity occurred less frequently in the netilmicin-clindamycin group (4.5%) than in the tobramycin-clindamycin group (21.7%). These results demonstrate that both the netilmicin-clindamycin and the tobramycin-clindamycin combinations are comparable in efficacy and in potential for causing nephrotoxicity. In this study, however, netilmicin was considerably less ototoxic than tobramycin.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]