These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Assessment of extraction procedures in the analysis of naturally contaminated grain products for deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin).
    Author: Trenholm HL, Warner RM, Prelusky DB.
    Journal: J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1985; 68(4):645-9. PubMed ID: 4030633.
    Abstract:
    A comparison of 2 extraction solvent systems (acetonitrile-water, 21 + 4 and methanol-water, 1 + 1) and 3 mixing apparatus (high-speed blender, wrist-action shaker, and mechanical stirrer) was carried out for different extraction time periods. Methods were evaluated using uncontaminated corn spiked with pure deoxynivalenol (DON), field-inoculated (Fusarium graminearum) corn, and uncontaminated and naturally infected wheat in swine diets. After sample extraction, aliquots were passed through alumina-charcoal cleanup columns, evaporated to dryness, dissolved in 8% aqueous methanol, and injected onto the liquid chromatograph. Results confirm published reports of recoveries from DON-spiked samples; however, longer extraction times (less than or equal to 120 min) were required for naturally contaminated samples. Use of the high-speed blender resulted in faster extractions, but in our laboratory more samples could be more conveniently extracted simultaneously with the wrist-action shaker or mechanical stirrer. Less carryover (co-extraction) of interfering contaminants was observed when acetonitrile-water was used vs methanol-water. Results emphasize the importance of careful evaluation of extraction procedures with not only spiked samples but also naturally contaminated samples to establish extraction times required for maximum deoxynivalenol recoveries.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]