These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The use of programmed electrical stimulation to assess the fibrillatory propensity of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Author: Murdock DK, Piao ZE, Euler DE, Murdock JD, Hwang MH, Loeb HS, Scanlon PJ.
    Journal: Invest Radiol; 1985 Sep; 20(6):579-82. PubMed ID: 4066228.
    Abstract:
    Coronary angiography occasionally results in ventricular fibrillation. To compare the fibrillatory propensity of conventional ionic and nonionic contrast media, we measured QT intervals and performed programmed electrical stimulation during intracoronary injection of Renografin 76 (R76), Hypaque 76 (H76), and iopamidol (IOP) in 16 open chest dogs. In ten dogs the incidence of ventricular fibrillation following induction of a single premature ventricular beat after every fourth atrial paced beat was 19/20 with R76, 8/20 with H76, and 0/20 with IOP (P less than .001). When two premature beats were induced, the incidence of ventricular fibrillation was 20/20 with R76, 19/20 with H76, and 1/20 with IOP (P less than .001). In six additional dogs, the mean prolongation of the QT interval was 170 +/- 20 msec with R76, 105 +/- 14 msec with H76, and 63 +/- 9 msec with IOP (P less than .001). Thus, programmed electrical stimulation readily induces ventricular fibrillation during intracoronary injection of conventional ionic contrast media. The incidence of ventricular fibrillation parallels the amount of QT interval prolongation produced. H76, which lacks EDTA and sodium citrate, is less fibrillatory than R76. However, the nonionic medium IOP appears far less fibrillatory than either R76 or H76.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]