These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Relevance of the immunoprecipitation assay to human immunogenicity of influenza vaccines.
    Author: Brandon FB, Havlick MJ, Shillis JL.
    Journal: Dev Biol Stand; ; 39():179-85. PubMed ID: 414949.
    Abstract:
    Influenza vaccines representing each of the four U.S. manufacturers' output for the 1975-76 respiratory season were characterized clinically and assayed by immunoprecipitation. All vaccines contained 350 CCA units/dose each of the A/Port Chalmers/1/73 (H3N2) and A/Scotland/840/74 (H3N2) viruses plus 550 CCA units/dose of B/HK/5/72 virus. Two of the vaccines were whole virus while the other two were subunit products; one made by extraction with ethyl ether, the second by detergent treatment. The vaccines were compared for serologic efficacy in children naturally primed to the (H3N2) family of viruses and by immunoprecipitation techniques against monospecific goat antiserum to the viral hemagglutinin prepared at the Bureau of Biologics of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. The subunit vaccines had significantly greater specific activity (human immunogenicity/unit mass of type-specific precipitable antigen) than the whole virus products. It is concluded that clinical immunogenicity is as much a function of antigen form (subunit vs whole virus) as it is of mass and that setting a level for precipitable antigen content alone is an insufficient criterion for potency standardization. Since antigen form, as well as mass, must be considered, immunoprecipitation may be useful for standardization of human immunogenicity only if candidate lots are compared by this technique to an homologous, reference vaccine of identical manufacture and form which is tested for potency in humans.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]