These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative study of prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac surgery. Clindamycin versus cephalothin.
    Author: Pien FD, Michael NL, Mamiya R, Takaki H, Slavish S, Bruce A, Moreno-Cabral RJ.
    Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Jun; 77(6):908-13. PubMed ID: 439926.
    Abstract:
    A randomized, prospective study of the relative effectiveness of clindamycin versus cephalothin was performed in 263 adult patients having cardiac surgery from September, 1977, to August, 1978. There were no statistically significant differences in frequency of postoperative infections in these two antibiotic groups. Wound infection developed in 6.5 percent of the cephalothin group and 3.2 percent of the clindamycin group. Urinary tract infection developed in 5.6 percent of the clindamycin group and 2.1 percent of the cephalothin group. Four bacteremic episodes occurred in the clindamycin-treated patients, and one episode of bacteremia occurred in a cephalothin-treated patient. No cases of endocarditis occurred during the study. Clindamycin deserved consideration as an alternative prophylactic agent to cephalothin for cardiac surgery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]