These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: An error in Rh testing in pregnancy.
    Author: Chown B, Bowman JM, Pollock J.
    Journal: Can Med Assoc J; 1975 May 17; 112(10):1215-6. PubMed ID: 47785.
    Abstract:
    Anti-D (anti-Rho) in the blood of two Rh-negative pregnant women was believed to be due to active immunization. In the first case, however, antibodies were no longer detectable 2 weeks later. In the second case they disappeared by the end of 31 weeks. It was discovered that both women had been given immune globulin (human) because of exposure to rubella. The globulin given to the first woman probably contained about 0.1 mug of anti-D per ml; that given to the second probably contained about 0.6 mug of anti-D per ml. Both babies were O Rh-positive. Both women were given Rh immune globulin after delivery. Both have completed a further pregnancy and no anti-D has been found on many tests. In tests carried out in 1971 all samples of immune globulin (human) examined contained anti-D, but usually in inconsequential trace amounts.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]