These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Reversal of ischemic damage with secondary blood cardioplegia.
    Author: Lazar HL, Buckberg GD, Manganaro AJ, Foglia RP, Becker H, Mulder DG, Maloney JV.
    Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Nov; 78(5):688-97. PubMed ID: 491722.
    Abstract:
    After severe ischemic injury, it is usually necessary to prolong bypass to enhance recovery. This study tests the hypothesis that the best reversal of ischemic damage is achieved by briefly rearresting the postischemic heart with a continuous infusion of an oxygenated cardioplegic solution (secondary blood cardioplegia) during the period when bypass must be prolonged. Twenty dogs underwent 45 minutes of normothermic ischemic arrest. Fifteen minutes after unclamping, no heart could support the systemic circulation. In all dogs, oxygen demands were lowered by extending bypass for 30 minutes. In 10 of these dogs, demands were further lowered by rearresting the heart for 5 minutes with a continuous infusion of a 37 degrees C blood cardioplegic solution (K+28 mEq/L; pH 7.6; Ca++ 1 mEq/L) at a pressure of 50 mm Hg. Hearts treated with secondary blood cardioplegia showed greater recovery in the rate of contraction (-dP/dt 75% versus 62%, p less than 0.05) and relaxation (-dP/dt 76% versus 58%, p less than 0.05), better recovery of compliance (85% versus 51%, p less than 0.05), a higher stroke work index (0.72 versus 0.50 gm-m/Kg, p less than 0.05), and more ability to augment oxygen uptake (85% versus 45%, p less than 0.05) to meet the demands of the working heart than hearts treated by prolonging bypass alone. We conclude that rearresting the heart with a brief, continuous infusion of a blood cardioplegic solution results in more complete reversal of ischemic damage than possible by prolongation of a bypass alone. We believe that the increased recovery with secondary cardioplegia results from diversion of delivered oxygen toward reparative processes rather than its being expended needlessly on electromechanical work during the time when bypass must be prolonged.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]