These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: False "false-positive" results in diagnostic cytology.
    Author: Tao LC, Weisbrod G, Ritcey EL, Ilves R.
    Journal: Acta Cytol; 1984; 28(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 6087589.
    Abstract:
    With the introduction of transbronchial brushings and fine needle aspiration biopsy, which enable us to obtain samples directly from lesions, the diagnostic potential of cytology for the detection of malignancy, including early cancer, has been greatly enhanced. From 1976 to 1982, five positive cytology reports were initially considered to be "false positives" on the basis of negative gross findings, benign operative biopsies or negative histologic findings in the resected surgical specimens. However, these proved to be false "false positives," based upon the clinical follow-up or further examination of the surgical specimens. Presentation is made of three of these cases with positive cytologic findings and initially negative histologic diagnoses, with an analysis of the causes of the latter. From our experience, four types of cancerous lesions seem prone to being missed during gross examination, namely: any small cancer with a consistency similar to that of the parenchyma of the organ in which the tumor is located, superficially invasive carcinoma, scar cancer and a radiologically occult lung cancer in the presence of a coexisting radiologically demonstrable lesion. With more clinical application of these cytologic methods, false "false positives" are expected to occur more often.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]