These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Urinary metanephrine radioimmunoassay: comparison with the colorimetric assay.
    Author: Raum WJ, Swerdloff RS.
    Journal: Clin Chem; 1981 Jan; 27(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 6108804.
    Abstract:
    A radioimmunoassay involving an 125I ligand has been developed and applied to the measurement of urinary metanephrine. To validate the clinical usefulness of this assay, we compared measurement of metanephrine by radioimmunoassay and of total urinary metanephrines by the Pisano colorimetric method. The radioimmunoassay is specific for metanephrine, whereas the colorimetric method measures both metanephrine and normetanephrine. We used both methods to determine urinary metanephrine or total metanephrines in subjects with essential hypertension, pheochromocytoma, the syndrome of multiple endocrine adenomatosis type 2, and normotensive volunteers. The mean and upper limit of normal (3 SD) for metanephrine by radioimmunoassay in our normotensive volunteers was 94.2 microgram/24 h and 229 microgram/24 h, respectively, which compares well with reported values of 87.6 microgram/24 h and 319 microgram/24 h by non-radioimmunoassay methods. Both radioimmunoassay and colorimetry accurately identified five patients with known pheochromocytoma. Good correlation (r = 0.993) was demonstrated between the two assays in a comparison of patients with essential hypertension and pheochromocytoma. We conclude that the radioimmunoassay is at least equivalent to the colorimetric methods in distinguishing pathological and normal catecholamine secretion, and is faster, more precise, and 1000-fold more sensitive.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]