These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A quantitative assessment of CNS sympatho-inhibition produced by psychotropic drugs. Author: Koss MC. Journal: Neuropharmacology; 1982 Jan; 21(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 6121301. Abstract: As one index of sympathetic reactivity, electrodermal responses (EDR) were evoked from central (hypothalamic) and peripheral (ulnar nerve) sites in pentobarbital-anesthetized cats. When compared with intravenous chlorpromazine (ED50 approximately 1.0 mg/kg), only thioridazine, trifluoperazine, and pimozide were less potent than chlorpromazine in reducing the amplitude of these centrally-evoked sympathetic-cholinergic responses. Perphenazine and methotrimeprazine (a non-neuroleptic phenothiazine) were about twice as potent as chlorpromazine. Haloperidol and triflupromazine were about 5 times as potent and chlorprothixine was more than 10 times as potent. None of these agents reduced the peripherally-evoked electrodermal response, indicating a CNS mode of action. Diazepam was without effect at either site. In addition, pretreatment with yohimbine (0.5 mg/kg. i.v.) did not significantly alter the ED50 for any of the above drugs. These results demonstrate that all of the phenothiazines and non-phenothiazine neuroleptics tested produce a dose-dependent central sympatho-inhibition and that diazepam does not. The results also suggest that there is no significant correlation between central sympatho-inhibition and the antipsychotic potency of these compounds and that their depression of central sympathetic outflow is independent of alpha-adrenergic mechanisms in the CNS.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]