These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Interaction of the component enantiomers of the putative dopamine autoreceptor agonist, TL-99 (6,7-dihydroxy-2-dimethylamino tetralin) with dopaminergic systems in mammalian brain and teleost retina. Author: Williams M, Martin GE, McClure DE, Baldwin JJ, Watling KJ. Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 1983 Dec; 324(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 6141532. Abstract: The enantiomers of the putative dopamine autoreceptor agonist, TL-99 (6,7-dihydroxy-2-dimethylaminotetralin) were examined in a number of in vivo and in vitro test paradigms to further examine the reported autoreceptor selectivity of this compound. The (+)-isomer of the aminotetralin was more active as a dopamine agonist than either the racemate or the (-)-enantiomer. In addition to this dopaminergic activity, TL-99 was found to be a potent alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, this activity being more prominent in the (+)-isomer. The (-)-isomer, however, was a weak alpha 2/DA receptor agonist and unlike the (+)-enantiomer was devoid of activity in the D-1-selective carp retina adenylate cyclase assay. Pharmacological examination of the effects of TL-99 on mouse locomotor activity showed that the effects of the aminotetralin in this dopamine autoreceptor test system were antagonized by either the alpha 2-antagonist, yohimbine or by the dopamine antagonist, sulpiride. TL-99 also produced contralateral turning in 6-OHDA lesioned rats. It is concluded that the apparent dopamine autoreceptor selectivity of TL-99 as assessed by in vivo animal test systems may be due partially to its alpha 2-agonist activity. The sedation and consequent reduction in mouse locomotor activity and in turning in the rat as the dose level is increased undoubtedly occurs via alpha 2-agonist and dopamine autoreceptor activity and cannot be interpreted as selectivity for the dopamine autoreceptor.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]