These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral bretylium tosylate in survivors of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation: clinical application of a new assay for bretylium.
    Author: Anderson JL, Patterson E, Wagner JG, Johnson TA, Lucchesi BR, Pitt B.
    Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1981; 3(3):485-99. PubMed ID: 6168830.
    Abstract:
    We studied 12 patients receiving either chronic oral (p.o.) maintenance bretylium and/or acute intravenous (i.v.) bretylium to evaluate drug efficacy and pharmacokinetics. All patients were survivors of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. A new assay for bretylium was applied, and it proved sensitive and reliable. After single intravenous dosing, bretylium was eliminated from serum with a mean rate constant of lambda iv1 = 0.0515 hr-1 and a corresponding elimination half-life of tiv1/2 = 13.5 hr (7 studies), similar to previous results in normals. Total body clearance averaged 428 ml/min, of which virtually all was accounted for by renal clearance. Seven patients responding to intravenous bretylium were transferred to oral drug. During chronic therapy (mean dose, 41 mg/kg/day bretylium tosylate), mean minimum steady-state concentration of bretylium was 186 ng/ml (range, 72-461) and was accurately predicted, within experimental error, by using the elimination rate constant determined for oral, but not intravenous, drug in normal subjects (lambda po1 = 0.115 hr-1). Determination of average steady-state concentration (Css) yielded similar conclusions. Mean 24 hr urinary excretion of bretylium during oral therapy was 18.3% (range, 9-13%). These results lend validity to earlier observations in normals and suggest route and concentration dependence of disposition. Transfer to oral bretylium allowed continued control of sustained ventricular tachycardia in all 7 patients and of unsustained ventricular tachycardia in 5. Orthostatic hypotension in 4 responded to protriptyline. Six were discharged on bretylium, with a mean follow-up of 12.2 months (range, 1-25.5). Four maintained a favorable response, and 2 died suddenly at 1 and 3 months. We conclude that further evaluation or oral bretylium is justified; attempts should be made to increase steady-state concentrations during oral therapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]