These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Role of cardiac electrophysiologic studies in patients with unexplained recurrent syncope.
    Author: Akhtar M, Shenasa M, Denker S, Gilbert CJ, Rizwi N.
    Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Mar; 6(2 Pt 1):192-201. PubMed ID: 6189057.
    Abstract:
    Cardiac electrophysiologic studies (EPS) with programmed electrical stimulation (PES) were performed in 30 patients with recurrent syncope to uncover possible arrhythmic etiology. All patients had undergone thorough medical and neurologic evaluation prior to EPS without finding a definitive cause for syncope. In the majority of patients an arrhythmic etiology for syncope was suspected but could not be documented utilizing the 12-lead surface ECG, extended in-hospital and/or ambulatory monitoring (for greater than or equal to 48 hours) and exercise testing prior to the EPS. The studies provided a clue to the possible underlying rhythm disturbance which could have caused syncope in 16/30 patients. Sustained or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation was induced in 11/30, sinus node dysfunction in 4/30 and intra-His block in the remaining one. Fourteen of the 16 have remained free of symptoms following therapy based on results of EPS during a follow-up period ranging from 6-30 months (mean 16.5 +/- 7.8). In 2/16 syncope recurred (one arrhythmic and one non-arrhythmic) despite pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction detected during EPS. In the remaining 14/30 patients, EPS and PES did not induce arrhythmia which could account for patient symptomatology and therefore no specific therapy could be recommended. Eleven of these 14 patients experienced a recurrence of symptoms within a 6-25 month period (mean 16.2 +/- 6.8). Of the 16 patients with inducible arrhythmias considered clinically significant, 15 had associated structural heart disease. On the other hand, of the 14 patients without clinically significant arrhythmias, structural heart disease could be detected in only three. It is concluded that cardiac arrhythmias constitute a common cause of unexplained syncope, particularly in patients with structural heart disease, and that EPS with PES can uncover the type of arrhythmic disturbance in a significant number of cases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]